Page 15 of 16

COVID Radar: A good example of open science

The article below describes a recent citizen science project regarding Covid. It shows the usefulness of this open approach and demonstrates the societal impact science has.

This article has earlier been published on the website of Leiden University.


COVID Radar is a good predictor of increasing infections

18 March 2021

The COVID Radar app is citizen science at its best. More than 200,000 users in the Netherlands are answering questions about their health and behaviour to help predict the development of the pandemic. Niels Chavannes, Professor of General Practice at Leiden University Medical Center, explains how the app – a ‘Leiden’ invention – works.

How did the COVID Radar come about?

‘At the beginning of the first wave, the testing capacity was still very low, and we saw that behaviour, such as keeping a safe distance, was an important predictor of the number of infections. Researchers from the LUMC and the Population Health Management degree programme then invented the Covid Radar (in Dutch) app. In collaboration with the IT company Ortec, they built a very easy-to-use app that maps out both the symptoms of COVID-19 and the associated behaviour. We immediately attracted a lot of users and still have more than 200,000 across the country who collectively already have answered six million questionnaires.’

‘The fill-in rate increases a lot as another wave arrives because people suddenly see their neighbour being taken away in an ambulance.’

What is the difference between this app and the government’s CoronaMelder app?

‘CoronaMelder only registers if you have tested positive yourself and gives a warning if you have been in the vicinity of infected people. COVID Radar doesn’t do that. Users of our app complete a short questionnaire about twice a week about whether they have tested positive or have experienced coronavirus-related symptoms such as cold symptoms or a loss of smell and taste. In addition, they answer questions about their behaviour: have you been in crowded places? Have you spent time within a metre and a half of people? It takes about 30 seconds; the questions are already answered by default and you just have to click the slider. Answering the questions is not compulsory, but the app gives you a friendly reminder if you haven’t completed it yet.’

What does it deliver?

‘It’s a sample that is particularly reliable in the Randstad because there are many users of the app in that area. The information from all those people together has an important predictive value. A week before there is an increase in confirmed infections, we see an increase in symptoms and a change in behaviour. People indicate that they are less compliant with the rules, such as keeping their distance and wearing masks. We saw that very clearly in the summer. A few weeks later, the number of infections increased rapidly. For example, we saw that the areas with a lot of students turned red and, when there was more lax behaviour, the reported symptoms increased afterwards.’

Gebruikers kunnen zien hoe de situatie is in hun postcodebied en in de rest van Nederland.

What about privacy?

‘That’s not at risk; we looked at that carefully. COVID Radar collects data by postcode area. That means that as an individual user, you are part of a group of 3,000 people in the same postcode area and you are not identified personally. The only personal data the app collects are age, gender and whether people work in healthcare, because that carries a higher risk of infection. The Dutch Data Protection Authority, which keeps a very close eye on privacy risks, granted permission in April 2020 and the app has been up and running ever since.’ 

Do you have any idea whether the users actually answer the questionnaire honestly?

‘We realise that not all participants will answer everything truthfully, but we do think that the users are a bit more the benevolent citizens from the population: they are motivated to participate because they want to give researchers greater insight for fighting the pandemic. Users don’t get individual feedback about the questions, and they don’t have to worry about us checking to see whether they’re getting tested, for example, because we don’t do that kind of thing. By the way, the fill-in rate increases a lot as another wave arrives because people suddenly see their neighbour being taken away by ambulance or have an aunt in intensive care.’

What is being done with the findings?

‘It’s citizen science and open science. Users can look at a newsfeed in the app to see how the pandemic is developing and, for example, can view graphs about their own postcode area. Users appreciate being kept up to date by a scientific team. Older users in particular say that they feel less lost as a result, especially if they are isolated at home.’

‘We can look by neighbourhood to see where things are getting out of hand.’

‘We also make the data available to officials. For instance, the mayor of Leiden already has been pleased to use it because we can look by neighbourhood to see where things are getting out of hand. The results are also going to the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) and the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, and we hope that they will make even better use of the information. A grant application is now pending to link this data to mobility data such as traffic flows. That will make it possible to predict more accurately where new hotspots will occur. European partners can also use the data to carry out comparative studies, and our first publications have now been submitted to scientific journals.’

The end of the pandemic is hopefully in sight as the number of vaccinated people increases. What does that mean for the future of the app?

‘It will still be needed, for this coronavirus pandemic and for other virus outbreaks. That’s why we want to recruit more new users. We already have participants from many different neighbourhoods, including those with lower socioeconomic status. But we are still looking for more young people and residents in rural areas. Together we can ensure that developments are more predictable so a new lockdown may not be necessary. There is also worldwide interest in COVID Radar. For instance, the WHO and Amref have expressed interest because they are looking for systems that can also provide early warning of other epidemics.’

The app is an initiative of the Public Health and Primary Care department, the Clinical Epidemiology department, and the Infectious Diseases department at the LUMC and the Population Health Management degree programme at Campus The Hague.

Text: Linda van Putten (Universiteit Leiden: https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/news/2021/03/covid-radar-is-a-good-predictor-of-increasing-infections)

Changing the game: on the assessment of researchers and their research

Dutch Recognition and Rewards in a European perspective

Yesterday (March 18) a consultation meeting of research performing organisations took place. The European Committee Research & Innovation organised this meeting. Several European research funders focused on the assessment of researchers and research teams. Jeroen Geurts, chair of ZonMw and ambassador for the Dutch initiative Recognition and Rewards, was there to represent the Dutch perspective.

Jeroen Geurts started his contribution to the round table discussion with a short statement in which he highlighted the position paper Room for everyone’s talent: towards a new balance in the recognition and rewards for academics and gave some examples of activities to assess researchers not only on their research but also on education, a balance between individual and team science, leadership and clinical research. Examples were among other things the introduction of a narrative CV in the funding scheme ‘Talent programme’ of NWO and ZonMw, a national report about professionalising data stewardship by setting out guidelines for competences, training and education, and to make Open Science (open access and FAIR data) a standard item to be addressed in calls and application forms.

Jeroen Geurts: “Reasons for success in the Dutch Rewards & Recognition process were the early build of a strong coalition of RPOs and funders and a subsequent bottom-up process that enabled thorough, local implementation of the changes proposed. This way, we could change not only the rules, but the entire game.”

More information

Many winners: First Dutch Higher Education Awards

The first prize of the Dutch Higher Education Awards is elected to TU Eindhoven innovation Space and LeerLevels of the Amsterdam University of applied sciences. On Monday march 1st, during the ComensiusFestival, Minister Van Engelshoven awarded the prizes for the first time.

The price helps educational teams to finance (new) projects for innovation and/or improvement of higher education.  The price serves as a recognition for teams of teachers that deliver a top performance, and it motivates teachers to continue their great work of innovation and knowledge sharing.

Other winning teams
The second and third place prizes for universities were awarded to Urban Futures Studio of the University Utrecht and RASL-minor, Erasmus University, in cooperation with Willem de Kooning Academie Hogeschool Rotterdam and Codarts. The second and third place prizes for universities of applies sciences were for the Open-ICT team of Utrecht and Team Value Creators of Windesheim.

An extensive article (in Dutch) and jury rapport can be found here.

A recap of the Recognition & Rewards Festival

Opening

On January 22nd, The Recognition & Rewards Festival took place. Together with almost 300 participants, we took a dive into cultural change and shared thoughts and ideas with each other regarding the recognition and rewards system in academics. From plenary discussions about the similarities between diplomacy and science with regard to culture change and the biggest concerns for young academics, to workshops where questions were elaborated and talked about in smaller groups. A successful day filled with exchanging knowledge, ideas and different viewpoints.    

The recordings and the presentation slides can be found here.

Plenary discussions

The day was opened with Kim Huijpen interviewing Jeroen Geurts and Rianne Letschert. They talked about the most important steps taken after publishing the position paper Room for everyone’s talent in November 2019. They emphasized the importance of diversity in academic profiles. Research and education remain important aspects in academic careers, but they also highlight the fact that we must create room for people to diversify their career paths. After this opening, we continued with an interview that focused on cultural change.

Paul Boselie had the honour to interview Reina Buijs, Director of the HRM department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In this conversation, an interesting parallel between academia and civil servants was highlighted. They touched upon important aspects within a change process in both academia and diplomacy, aspects such as good leadership, training, learning by doing and coaching. After this interview we changed the setting to a round table conversation.

The round table conversation was held between several young academics as well as with Rianne Letschert and Jeroen Geurts. During this conversation, the urgence of a new system of recognizing and rewarding academics was emphasized again. The young academics talked about the meaning of this for early career academics and how young academics see a future with more diverse career perspectives. It was very interesting to discuss and hear the views and experiences of the ‘next generation’.

Workshops

After the substantive plenary sessions in the morning, a much-deserved break was up next. Participants got the opportunity to talk to each other, visit a video booth or enter into a ‘speeddate carousel’. And of course, were encouraged to have some lunch or go for a walk outside. After this break, where energy was recharged, the participants continued the programme by attending several different workshops. The workshops allowed the participants the opportunity to dive into different questions that were posed in the morning on a deeper level. 

The workshop ‘Open Science’ was given by Jeroen Sondervan (UU) and Sander Bosch (VU). In this workshop they discussed the link between open science and recognizing and rewarding. And more specifically, which aspects of open science need to be recognised and rewarded within research and education. With the help of online tools like Miro this led to interesting debates and new ideas. Interesting to see was that there were more suggestions about the recognition and reward system for research than for education.

Another workshop, ‘Challenges for UMC’ touched upon subjects regarding the three core tasks of UMC – research, education and healthcare. An inspiring discussion took place about the combination of those three and the importance of recognition and reward with regard to the core tasks.

The workshop ‘Change approach Recognition & Rewards’ dove into the change approach of the program recognition and rewards. The participants talked about how to make sure the changes that are thought of, actually make a positive difference. And when is the program a success? Food for thought!

Another workshop was an ‘Introduction to- and dialogue about Recognition & Rewards’. Elke van Cassel gave an introduction about the program and specifically talked about the position paper and how it is implemented at Tilburg University. After this, two discussions were held about the importance of young academics in this program and including science communication in a new version on recognition and rewards.

Closing

To wrap up the day, Ingrid van Engelshoven, Minister of Education, gave her final words. She talked about the most important dilemma’s and questions that were discussed and matched the spirit of the day perfectly: “Recognition and Rewards is all about team effort, working on this culture change is a team effort”.

We are happy to notice that we are not the only ones writing about the festival! Please also read the other blogs and reports.

Dutch: https://www.utoday.nl/news/69364/dagje-online-festival-vieren-voor-meer-erkenning

Dutch: https://www.scienceguide.nl/2021/01/hoger-in-de-times-higher-education-ranking-met-anders-erkennen-en-waarderen/